Knowledge Base

Would the PLH be entitled to any revenue for intra-Africa (with no tie up agreements necessary) with or without the usage of the SP’s platform?

If we select to sign up for the Web/Mobile platforms for payments originating from the USA (beyond just API), do we have the option to use the SP’s platform for the African corridors?

If we opt for API only, will KYC/AML service continue to be provided by the PLH? Please confirm.

Can we also market in the African corridors we are licensed in and send/receive payments between the African corridors?

Can we, in due time, transfer to another license in the future (if one day we decide to obtain our own license in the USA)?

Would we be sub-licensed under the Principle License Holder (PLH)?

We do not want to hide the fact that we are a crypto company in Asia; however, for EU, we understand crypto topics could be sensitive to most banks. Thus, we prefer to simply utilize the fiat transaction in EU (via an EMI license holder). Can you please tell us how we could be flexible in this case?

Our model indicates the fact of using crypto transactions in Asia only (not in the EU), and that instead of connecting user to user, we aim to connect merchants (in Asia) to users (in EU) and merchants (in EU) to users (in Asia). Is this model valid?

Since our company is about to obtain a Labuan Money Brokering license, may I know whether it is sufficient to use this license to apply to be a Registered Agent (RA) under an EMI holder?

There is no crypto-license sponsorship option in the EU, am I right?